Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• Architecture
• Sustainability

• Bio-based Materials
• Brick
• Construction Materials
• COURTESY THE DESIGNERS AND MANUFACTURERS
• Earth Construction
• Healthy Materials
• Petra Loho
• Rammed Earth
• Sirewall
• Terra-cotta

Open Design Collective, General Architecture Collaborative, and Nowhere Collaborative are helping reinvent design practice by creating community-led processes and turning traditional Western design thinking on its head. They center marginalized individuals and women, who are still underrepresented in the design field and often overlooked in decision-making in the built environment. All three firms are sharing power to bring prosperity back to disinvested places and truly change people’s lives.

01. Nowhere Collaborative

Architect Catherine Baker made the leap from an established firm to transform and be transformed by the rural community of Boswell, Indiana (population 800). Nowhere Collaborative is a one-woman, place-based practice that is intent on addressing issues specific to its community.

Verda Alexander (VA): Tell us about your design journey and why you started Nowhere Collaborative.

Catherine Baker (CB): In college, I was interested in the cultural impact of design, so instead of architecture, I got my graduate degree in social science. My first job was at a firm creating affordable housing. It was rewarding, but I also started to question the top-down funding model and how limiting design solutions were because of it. I wanted to engage with the community in a more thoughtful way.

During the pandemic, my husband and I started spending more time in our tiny farmhouse in rural Indiana than in our apartment in downtown Chicago. These smaller towns have been neglected. You could not even access high-speed internet—and this is just 100 miles outside of Chicago. I saw an opportunity to look at a community that didn’t have the resources that urban areas have.

So, I created Nowhere Collaborative, a place-based firm. It’s not about a typology of architecture but about an actual place—Boswell, Indiana—where there’s been a lot of disinvestment. And if you can make a practice work in a town of 800 in rural Indiana, it could be a model that works almost anywhere.

Maya Bird-Murphy (MBM): What are your design values, and how do you embed them in your practice?

CB: People need good design and architecture. I think creative design-thinking skills are everywhere, not just in urban areas. Communities of disinvestment are everywhere. You can’t assume that because an area is rural there’s a type of person who lives there. The town we’re in is undergoing rapid demographic changes. The rest of the county is 98 percent white, but this town is 30 percent Latinx. There is diversity in these places. We just must be open to seeing and understanding it.

There’s an authenticity here that I hope to project and embody. You might think of Mies van der Rohe’s “less is more,” but I think in this case it’s “do more with less” because you have to be really creative with really tight budgets. I love that challenge. You know there isn’t funding to do a super-high-end detail, but that doesn’t mean you can’t have responsive designs and creative solutions.

VA: Walk us through one of your projects.

CB: I’m currently the only architect in town. I’m working on two projects with the Wabash Economic Growth Alliance (WEGA). WEGA recognized that the lack of quality business spaces in small towns was impeding development, so to support regional growth, it is developing a business incubator and market. One of the projects, The Social Exchange, is the restoration of a historic downtown building that will serve as a business training facility and networking hub with a deli on the ground floor. The second project, The Market, is a new construction in the core of historic downtown that is anchored by a farm store and surrounded by small retail training spaces for dining, food, produce, and craft entrepreneurs. The idea is to create economic development. Once you graduate from the business incubator, you could start renting space in the market and, eventually, grow into a brick-and-mortar space of your own.

You can make these incremental changes in the community that will change people’s perspectives of where they live.

02. Open Design Collective

Vanessa Morrison and Deborah Richards lead Open Design Collective, a nonprofit organization that creates social and spatial change in Oklahoma City through large- and small-scale community-led urban planning, architecture, and design projects. These two women have placed themselves staunchly within the community, working against the negative effects of gentrification and disinvestment that happen in the name of progress in cities like theirs all over America.

MBM: Tell us about your design journey and why you started Open Design Collective.

Vanessa Morrison (VM): I’ve worked over the last 18 years in social services, public health, and trauma and crisis intervention. For me, community service is central to everything I do, and I saw the urban planning profession as a way to be on the preventative side, instead of the reactive, where I could help create, build, and design environments that were healthier.

Deborah Richards (DR): I went to architecture school, but I was always interested in participatory design and engagement. I was interested in learning about how to give people agency in design choices even if they weren’t trained as an architect or a designer. In architecture school, the emphasis was to identify problems and create solutions. We created the wildest solutions that were like whole new worlds. But I found there were problems with this—where were the people? Where were the worlds that are based on existing community assets and knowledge?

VA: What problem are you trying to solve?

VM: Our mission is to support the social and spatial needs of Black and marginalized communities. Everything from urban renewal to redlining to segregation and systemic forms of violence have been inflicted on these communities. It’s important that we don’t repeat those patterns of injustice. As we’re co-creating ideas with community members, we go deep into addressing the historical context and root causes.

DR: We start at the base level through discus­sions with community members, identify­ing the existing skill sets, knowledge, needs, and opportunities. Then we create whole projects around them that incorpo­rate planning, visioning, architecture, and fundraising. We are looking for opportunities to create stronger commu­nity networks and build off the legacy of the communities that are already here.

VA: Tell us about one of your favorite projects.

VM: We just secured a $500,000 EPA grant, which is unprecedented for Oklahoma. There’s a small Black-owned business working on an outdoor expansion on an Urban Renewal Authority–owned lot, and we’re designing and building a green space to better connect to the natural environ­ment and strengthen social connections. We’re able to support the ongoing mobiliz­ing efforts of environmental justice issues in this community by having air monitoring systems in the park.

DR: There’s a big issue to overcome in Okla­homa regarding density to support retail. How do we create walkable communities? How do those community connections and proximity strengthen businesses and residential opportunities? So, this process also includes capacity building—allowing people to understand how to talk about these issues and how issues such as density, culture, and inclusion impact their daily lives. This gives them a stronger voice and empowers them to have conver­sations with the city.

03. General Architecture Collaborative

General Architecture Collaborative (GAC) is a nonprofit organization in New York and a social enterprise in Rwanda that works with individuals, communities, and institutions to create a more equitable world through design, research, and advocacy. They are working to change the top-down model of how development is done in the Global South, where the people getting funds and infrastructure are handily dismissed, continuing old patterns of imperialism. Here’s our conversa­tion with cofounders Yutaka Sho and Leighton Beaman.

VM: Also, how can people in this community be developers, property owners, and a part of building the community up again? How do we preserve the existing assets and make sure that as new development comes in, it’s cohesive and connected to the history that is so strong with this neighborhood, but also designed and built in a way that doesn’t over-encapsu­late what’s still here? Now we’re working on an entire northeast Oklahoma City cultural master plan and showing people this work is possible.

VA: Tell us why you started GAC and what led you to Rwanda.

Yutaka Sho (YS): The members of GAC met at the Harvard GSD, and we formed the nonprofit shortly after we graduated. We wanted to use our design agency and advocacy efforts to support people who don’t typically have access to good design.

My design beliefs originated in a food cooperative that my mother used to work for called Seka’s Club in Tokyo. It started in 1968 with 200 members; they now have 300,000 members. They run eldercare facilities, an orphanage, a bank, and whatever the community needs. It’s 90 percent run by housewives. Housewives in Japan are the lowest tier of the social hierarchy. If they can do it, anybody can do it.

When we went to Rwanda, we met with many female-run NGOs, locally founded and operated. Right after the genocide in 1994, 70 percent of the population were women because men were either killed or jailed. Women were not able to own land or businesses, but suddenly they had to take the lead in rebuilding the devastated country and economy. We were interested in how women build, how they make decisions, and what different types of spaces they make. We wanted to support them, but not from a place of charity. We wanted to be equals and collaborate. So that was the beginning, and our test to see if we could run this rickety, precarious practice.

VA: What issues are you hoping to address?

YS: This divide between North and South is a problem in my mind. The Global North fundraises and then sends money to the Global South to do development work. Seventy percent of the federal budget in Rwanda is from foreign aid. Foreign companies come in and lead the development projects, and the end users don’t have much say in how the development money is used. Nobody listens to them because they’re considered to be under-educated and disorganized. We are trying to change how the global development industry is doing business there.

Leighton Beaman (LB): As a designer, you are taught that you have a say over how everything goes because it’s your vision. It takes a little bit of learning to let go and become a coauthor with other people.

For example, in the first earthbags house that we collaborated on, there were parts of the project that were woven by local weavers. They typically make things that are small-scale like a bag or a bowl. In this project, they started to weave entire walls that could roll up and come down to block wind or provide some privacy, and that was a moment I realized this approach was nothing I would have imagined, drawn, detailed, or specified, and it only came into being because a group of people from that community were building the project.

MBM: What impact do you hope to make when you look toward the future?

LB: We’re a sort of design-build firm; we use the entire project process as a catalyst for community change. We leverage the network of NGOs and organizations already in the region to join us in that process. And we’re conscious to not create another relationship of dependence.

YS: We hope to make ourselves obsolete so that we are not needed anymore. It’s kind of ridiculous that sometimes we represent our end users to the donors or the government because our end users are considered not educated or incapable of representing themselves. This is the worst postcolonial power hierarchy that’s being exacerbated.

LB: In the future, [we want it to] be normal to advocate for communities, and to involve people in the process more. It’s like erasing some of the things that define us as being anything other than normal.

VA: I love that. Alternative practice is not alternative anymore.

LB: Yes. In many ways, we are not that alternative. We’re designing things for people. Maybe the process is a little bit different, but one of the things that we get sometimes is like, “Oh, you do humanitarian work?” And it’s like, “Well, shouldn’t all architecture be humanitarian in some way? Aren’t we making it for humans?”

Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• Architecture
• Cities
• Diversity
• Equity
• Process
• Sustainability

• Community Engagement
• Equity and Access
• Real Estate and Investment
• Verda Alexander and Maya Bird-Murphy

Circularity in Construction

Circularity in construction reshapes the industry by prioritizing the reuse, recycling, and repurposing of materials to minimize waste and environmental impact. Some people, like Felix Haisel, assistant professor at Cornell University College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, are working to shift the focus from linear to circular thinking about material consumption with the Circular Construction Lab. Others, like Shannon Goodman, former Perkins&Will architect, helped develop a coalition like ReBuildATL and cofounded the Lifecycle Building Center to break these systemic barriers and keep reusable materials out of landfills. Finally, many people like Sydney Mainster, designer and director of sustainability at the Durst Organization, and Blaine Brownell, architect and editor of the Transmaterial book series found different ways to repurpose demolition building materials like concrete and glass to help reduce overall building waste.

Read more in the following articles:

Next-Gen Construction Technologies

Next-generation construction technologies are revolutionizing the industry, introducing groundbreaking solutions that streamline processes and redefine the way we build. For example, METROPOLIS Future100 honorees like Chizumi Kano from California College of the Arts, and Andrea Rubero from Rice School of Architecture, found inventive ways to apply natural building materials to create sustainable and culturally attuned projects. Meanwhile, technologies from major brands like Lumion, Nix, and Caesarstone are highlighting the versatility of materials in the built environment. On the other hand, architecture teams like Foster + Partners and the University of London are creating free, open-source technologies to fill gaps in today’s software offerings. Finally, Material Bank, the world’s largest marketplace for those seeking architectural, design, and construction materials, acquired Architizer in hopes of aiding architect users and architectural product manufacturers.

Learn more about next-gen construction technologies here:

Creative Concrete

Today, manufacturers and architects are exploring innovative alternatives that transform concrete and cement to contributors to global sustainable design and construction. Some of these concrete products rely on recycling concrete itself, while others cultivate new, less energy- and carbon-intensive recipes. For example, Biomason and GXN’s Biocement uses non-modified bacteria to grow a cement-like material, while Brimstone created a cement using carbon-free calcium silicate rock. Over in Germany, researchers at the Dresden University of Technology, created the “Cube,” the first building made of carbon-reinforced concrete, which is stronger, lighter and customizable. Similar to that note, WRNS Studio revamped Okland Construction’s Salt Lake City office with a board-formed concrete material that blends natural lumber and a ready mix together. Finally, ETH Zurich’s HiLo building is constructed of a sustainable concrete design blending medieval construction techniques with digital fabrication technology.

Delve deeper into stories about creative concrete:

The Past and Future of Timber

From its roots in traditional building practices to its emergence as a sustainable solution for modern construction, mass timber is bridging the past and future of architecture with eco-friendly innovation. Take ZGF Architects’ revamp of the Portland International Airport with its nine-acre prefab wood roof, tree-lined terminal and multiple skylights bringing in natural light to the facility. Not only did it bring more attention to an already beloved airport, but it became a new milestone for mass timber. Meanwhile, Chicago Wrightwood 659 Gallery’s exhibition “American Framing,” brought attention to softwood lumber construction and how it can continue to evolve in the building industry. Finally, resource professionals like Kenn Busch conducted multiple focus groups and conversations with A&D specifiers to answer questions about obtaining sustainable wood in the United States, in hopes of showing the impact of forest products.

Read more about the past and future of timber here:

Innovations in Modular Construction

Innovative advancements in modular construction are transforming the way buildings are constructed, enabling scalable and more sustainable solutions for modern housing projects. For example, take KTGY Architecture + Planning’s “drop and lock” prefab technique, which allows parts to be fabricated off-site, and has been used to create affordable housing developments like Hope on Alvarado in Los Angeles. Also in the Los Angeles area, firm Studio One Eleven used shipping containers to create the development Watts Works, a community of 24 studio apartments that is working to reshape the underbuilt affordable housing sector. Meanwhile, across the country in New York, Liv-Connected’s design-forward units are also helping redefine modular housing and offer more affordable options for the city.

Learn more about innovations in modular construction:

Conclusion

As construction materials and technologies continue to evolve, they are driving innovation and reshaping the future of the industry. By embracing sustainable solutions, advanced manufacturing techniques, and cutting-edge technologies, the construction sector is poised to deliver more efficient, durable, and eco-friendly projects. Staying ahead in this dynamic landscape requires a commitment to continuous learning and adaptation, ensuring that the structures we build today meet the challenges of tomorrow.

Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• Circular Design
• Concrete
• Construction Materials and Technologies
• Mass Timber
• Timber

• Architecture
• Sustainability
• Technology

Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• News
• Residential

• Sustainability

The particular challenge in this case was the tropical climate: humid year-round with heavy rain during the monsoon season. To contend with this, the construction process for the 2,109-square-foot building was a two-year game of trial and error, and a close collaboration with local builders who had never worked on such a project before. Multiple types and mixes of material, and different levels of pressure during compression, were tested to find the right combination of texture, thickness, strength, and durability.

To ensure quality control, each batch of earth was hand-tested before application. Nonetheless, as rammed earth isn’t considered a load-bearing material in Thailand, a reinforced cement structure, as well as additional cement in the earthen mix itself, was required. 

The material diversity—earth was collected from various locations around Thailand—is manifested in the building’s appearance. Its distinctive multihued facade features a range of blacks, reds, beiges, and whites, which are turning heads. “People stop and ask questions, wondering what it is, as they’ve never seen buildings like these before,” Suphasidh says.

More than its unique aesthetic, though, she hopes this building shows that if material knowledge is applied in a way suited to its locale, advances in building methods can happen outside contexts where precision and standardization are the norm: “My vision is that progress happens and is equally acknowledged at every location. Each specific culture and climatic zone warrant their very own idiosyncratic responses to the shared challenges in the climate crisis experienced globally.”

Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• Architecture
• Interior Design
• Sustainability

• Avinash Rajagopal
• Building Products
• Circularity in products
• Climate Adaptation
• Cupaclad
• Glen-Gery
• Guardian Glass
• Jeld-Wen
• Kawneer
• Longboard Products
• Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope
• Stone Bricks

01  Federal Investment: The EPA Pumps Money into Low-Carbon Materials

Over the summer, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made some key announcements about how it plans to spend close to $250 million to support a transition to low-carbon construction materials in the country. 

The first announcement, in July, listed 38 recipients of a total of nearly $160 million in grants to help businesses assess and report their carbon emissions through Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), thereby making vetted low-emitting new and salvaged options available to architects and builders in 14 product categories. Among the grant awardees are Build Reuse (see “Squaring Circular Design” in METROPOLIS’s Products 2024 issue), which will develop a way to assess and declare emissions through salvaged materials, and the International Living Future Institute (ILFI), which will build on the success of its Declare label to enhance EPD data quality and accessibility.

In August, the EPA announced that it will put $100 million toward a new label program to define what “clean” (i.e., low-emission) construction materials are, and to help federal agencies and other buyers use those materials in their projects. The label program will prioritize steel, glass, asphalt, and concrete, and every product that earns the label will be listed in a publicly accessible central registry.

Both these initiatives are focused on American-made materials in keeping with the larger goals of the Inflation Reduction Act, from which these funds are derived.

02 Social Equity: The Just 3.0 Label Launches

At the time of writing, 188 organizations around the world had the ILFI Just 2.0 label, one of the most popular ways for companies in the building industry to demonstrate their commitment to and achievements in social equity and justice. The label is especially valuable to architecture firms—103 practices in the United States alone have invested in Just.

This May, at the Living Future Conference, ILFI announced the release of Just 3.0, the next version of the label, which incorporates program updates and offers refinements to some existing indicators. It also includes three new indicators:

01 Recruitment, which measures the diversification of the workforce along an expansive list of criteria including not just race, ethnicity, or gender but also socioeconomic background, parental/caregiver status, and many more.

02 Accessibility asks organizations to address both physical and digital access as well as workplace culture, policies, training, and regular assessment of practices and systems.

03 Racial + Ethnic Pay Equity aims to reduce disparities in pay, expanding Just 2.0’s requirements around gender-based pay equity.

03 Gathering Steam: Other Recent Developments in Sustainable Design

Here are some other recent developments in policy, certification, and movement building in the United States:

HEAT STRESS 
The U.S. Department of Labor released a proposed rule in July requiring employers to protect their workers from the effects of extreme heat. If it goes into effect, it will apply to about 35 million Americans working both indoors and outdoors.

A NATIONAL PLAN 
In April, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy released the first-ever federal plan for decarbonizing the building industry. Titled Decarbonizing the U.S. Economy by 2050: A National Blueprint for the Buildings Sector, the document is remarkable not only for its consideration of embodied carbon emissions but also for the connections it builds between decarbonization and equity, affordability, and resilience.

HEALTHY BUILDING POLICY 
The International WELL Building Institute plans to host the first Healthy Building Policy Summit in Washington, D.C., in September, bringing together policymakers, government officials, industry leaders, and public health experts to examine policy that affects the built environment and thereby influences human health and well-being.

Would you like to comment on this article? Send your thoughts to: comments@metropolismag.com

• News

• Avinash Rajagopal
• Construction Materials
• Embodied Carbon
• Equity and Access

At Belgium’s inaugural McDonald’s in Beurs is a bronze wall plaque that states the year it was founded: 1978, the same decade the oil crisis brought into question the reliance on plastics in manufacturing furnishings. After a recent refurbishment, however, few other signs of the ’70s remain, as McDonald’s is looking beyond its brown mansard roofs of the past toward a more ecologically conscious future. 

The Beurs branch follows in the footsteps of two earlier circular pilot projects in France, designed by Antwerp-based studio WeWantMore, helmed by Ruud Belmans and Thomas Vanden Abeele. WeWantMore’s multidisciplinary approach, working both as interior designers and as brand consultants, allowed the team to integrate McDonald’s global identity with cutting-edge sustainability practices developed by the firm’s materials research team.